• Home
  • I
  • Innovation and the Future of Learning

Focus Area:
Innovation and the Future of Learning

At CRPE, we study how public education can evolve to meet the challenges and opportunities of a rapidly changing world. Our research on innovation and the future of learning examines how schools are rethinking teaching and learning models—from personalized and competency-based approaches to the use of technology and AI—to better prepare students for life beyond school. We investigate how these innovations take shape in real contexts, what barriers and enablers schools encounter, and how systems can support sustainable change. Across this work, we aim to understand how schools and communities can design learning environments that are more equitable, adaptable, and responsive to the diverse needs of students.

  • The Lens    

Cui Bono: Conflicts of Interest Are in the Eyes of the Beholder

Steven Hodas

Everything that schools do, they buy, one way or another. Whether it’s professional development, curricula and tests, or pencils, hamburger, and software, the choice is the same: either spend money on salaries and materials to make it yourself, or pay someone else to spend their money on salaries and materials and then buy it from them.

  • The Lens    

Clash of Cultures: Blue Collar, White Collar, and School Reform

Steven Hodas

The vitriol that characterizes much of the dialog on school reform is most roiling when the conversation turns, as it invariably does, to teachers unions on one hand, and “corporate reformers” on the other.

  • The Lens    

The Procurement Tightrope Shouldn’t Tie Districts in Knots

Robin Lake, Steven Hodas

Clearly it wasn’t only the failed $1.3 billion deal to put iPads in the hands of all students and teachers that forced the resignation of Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) Superintendent John Deasy.

  • Research Reports    

A Blueprint for Effective and Adaptable School District Procurement

Tricia Maas, Robin Lake

This report outlines the problems districts face in procuring innovative goods and services, shows how other sectors have modernized procurement processes, and recommends ways to reform district procurement.

  • The Lens    

Bringing Data to the School Enrollment Game

Steven Hodas

The recent New York Times article on New York City’s high school admissions process describes how the incorporation of game theory into an algorithm for matching students with schools has substantially increased the rates at which students are matched to schools of their choosing.

  • The Lens    

inBloom and the Failure of Innovation 1.0

Steven Hodas

Michael Horn’s recent piece on the failure of inBloom captures why it was the very opposite of a disruptive innovation from a markets perspective, as well the fatal blind spots and judgment errors present from its inception.

  • The Lens    

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: An Insider’s Perspective on Urban District Innovation

Steven Hodas

Steven Hodas (@stevenhodas) is a veteran of both the New York City Department of Education and the edtech industry. In this blog series, School District Innovation: When Practice Collides with Policy, he provides insights into the challenges, struggles, and opportunities of large-district attempts to reform longstanding practices and change cultural norms.

  • The Lens    

Market-Based Accountability Won’t Be Enough

Robin Lake

This blog was first posted on 6/11/2014 at redefinED, as part of their series on the future of parental choice and accountability.

  • The Lens    

Keeping Personalized Learning Schools on Track

Larry Miller, Betheny Gross

This blog was originally published by the National Association of Charter School Authorizers, June 5, 2014 Charter schools are leading the nation in seeking new ways to personalize learning with a blend of teacher-led and technology-based instruction.

  • Research Reports    

Policy Barriers to School Improvement: What’s Real and What’s Imagined?

Larry Miller

This report examines federal, state, and district barriers that principals say hinder their ability to make innovative school improvements.

Skip to content